Is Meta going to end China's open source model? The core members of Muse sang down Kimi, and as a result, the comments section was besieged

Comparative news, according to monitoring, Zengyi Qin, a member of Meta Super Intelligence Lab and a core contributor to Muse Spark, openly advocates undermining the Chinese open source model. He said that Meta has an order of magnitude more computing power and better data, and Muse Spark will eventually surpass Chinese models such as Kimi. He also pushed the judgment to the commercial level: major US customers such as JPMorgan will switch to the US open model due to compliance, and Chinese laboratories will also lose this portion of inference revenue. Meta has its own Facebook and Instagram to make money, but Chinese model companies rely more on model revenue. The comment section soon began to ask: Meta has not lacked computing power and data for the past two years, so why hasn't it suppressed the Chinese model? Others asked how much revenue JPMorgan actually contributed to Kimi. Some people are even sarcastic, and if this is the level of reasoning of the core members of Muse Spark, they are starting to worry about Muse's model performance. Muse Spark 1.2 is about to open weights, and Meta will indeed add another heavyweight US rival to Kimi, DeepSeek, and Qwen. However, from the direct push of a strong enemy to the fact that the Chinese model will be crushed by computing power and US revenue will also be lost, there is still a big gap in the middle.