Farcaster · 352
What happened to Farcaster, which was sold twice in a year and is valued at $1 billion?

What happened to Farcaster, which was sold twice in a year and is valued at $1 billion?

Author: Shenchao TechFlow Original title: Farcaster, which was once valued at 1 billion US dollars, ushered in a project resold for the second time in a year, and was sold twice within a year. What an experience. On August 17, Farcaster operator Neynar's co-creator Rish announced the search for a new team for the Farcaster agreement, official app, and coin platform Clanker. The company returned the remaining funds and the team later disbanded. It's only been 7 months since Neynar took over the project from the founding team. And that handover was Farcaster's first “sold”. This Web3 social star, once invested by Paradigm and a16z and valued at $1 billion, has entered the process of finding a home for the second time in a year. The founding team that left first On January 21 of this year, Farcaster's founding team, Merkle Manufactory, did an uncommon thing: handing over all of the agreements, codebase, official app, and Clanker to Neynar, and then refunded all of the $180 million in financing to investors. The two founders, Dan Romero and Varun Srinivasan, joined the payment chain Tempo (a project incubated by Stripe and Paradigm). The money was refunded, the people left, and the project was left behind. The takeover, Neynar, a middleware company that makes Farcaster development tools, raised $11 million in Series A in 2024. What it saw when it took over was a developer-first social network and a coin machine that was printing money. After 7 months, it also started looking for a new home. Rish wrote in the announcement that the acquisition seemed like a good choice at the beginning of the year, but then it changed so much that Neynar “no longer fits the needs of the next phase.” The announcement was posted on Farcaster in advance, and he said, don't be so sudden this time around. The money printer temporarily shut down. Among the assets Neynar took over, the most valuable was Clanker, an AI one-click coin issuing robot. At the beginning of this year, when the AI coin issuance hype was at its peak, it was Farcaster Ecological's cash cow, which swept away $35 million in on-chain coin service fees in one quarter. According to DeFilLama data, Farcaster Ecosystem's agreement fee: $35.43 million for the first quarter of 2026. In the second quarter, $4.67 million. From July 1 to August 17, $377,000. But for the past 24 hours, the agreement cost was only $4001. From 35.43 million in a single quarter to 4,000 in a single day, the drop was 99%. The cumulative processing fee of 94.1 million US dollars since its launch has become a monument parked at the top of the mountain. Meanwhile, CLANKER token repurchases, which are fed by handling fees, have stopped. The cost side is also an issue. According to Rish, to keep this full-stack social network running, it costs 100,000 dollars a month, and at its peak, 500,000. However, in the last 30 days, the revenue of the entire ecosystem was $120,000, which can only be said to cover the monthly consumption of the project. At the same time, RiSH also wrote on Farcaster: The operating cost is really high, but it really wasn't a factor in our decision. This number is being disclosed because it may influence the next team's decisions. Our balance sheet can absorb current costs indefinitely. The other sentence is more straightforward: “This is not a financial decision. Gathering energy is much harder than raising capital. “(It's much harder to raise energy than capital.) is probably the most accurate microcosm of Farcaster's development over the past seven years. Perhaps the problem with the consumer-grade social illusion Farcaster really isn't the cost. After the market is booming, it is not critical how much money the project burns this month, because the existing capital can still cover this part. But in terms of direction and demand, one question is hard to avoid: Why are users leaving X and coming to you? Alliance Co-Founder Imran's review is straightforward: Farcaster was a useful...

4d ago深潮TechFlow#Farcaster #WEB3

Alliance Co-Creation: Decentralized Social Graph is not Farcaster's core value, social trading or direction to attract users

Comparing news, Alliance co-founder Imran wrote on the X platform that Farcaster is a good infrastructure and application experiment, but the decentralized social graph itself is not enough to attract users away from traditional social platforms such as X. He believes that the direction that really deserves attention is social trading, which integrates new token discovery, speculative trading, and PnL reputation into a closed loop of native products. Currently, this model is difficult to replicate by traditional social platforms such as X and Instagram. Furthermore, Imran summarized this product evolution path as MetaMask → Phantom → Farcaster → Moonshot → Vector → Fomo/Pump, believing that each generation of products further reveals the needs that crypto users really care about. Earlier, Neynar co-founder Rish Mukherji wrote on the X platform that the team has initiated procedures to find new ownership or operation teams for Farcaster, Clanker, and Neynar.

4d ago

Neynar will find new operating teams for Farcaster, Clanker, etc., and return the company's remaining capital

According to Twitter, Neynar co-founder Rish Mukherji wrote on the X platform that the team has initiated procedures to find new ownership or operation teams for Farcaster, Clanker, and Neynar, and is currently in touch with several teams that may be suitable for operating decentralized social apps and related developer products. Rish said that as things have changed over the past few months, the Neynar team is no longer in a position to take charge of the next phase of development of these products. The company will return the funds on its balance sheet, most of which are still kept, and team members will move in a new direction. At the same time, he said he is still optimistic that Farcaster can find a long-term suitable development model in the next stage.

4d ago

Ethereum's 11th anniversary: From humble offices to the world's computers, core developers post classic photos from launch day

In comparison, Ethereum's early core developer Lefteris Karapetsas (@lefteris .eth) wrote an article in Farcaster to mark the 11th anniversary of the launch of Ethereum. Unbelievable, it's been 11 years. In 2015, we launched Ethereum in a small, humble office in Berlin's Kreuzberg district. Since then, everything has changed dramatically. Ethereum has gone through countless changes, but one thing has remained the same: Ethereum is the world's computer. In an old photo posted by Lefteris Karapetsas, on the day of the Ethereum mainnet launch on July 30, 2015, early core developers took this classic group photo in a humble office. Frontier block #1 ,028,201 was displayed on the background screen, showing information related to the launch block. Early core developers and contributors gathered to celebrate, including Gavin Wood, Christian Reitwiessner, Christoph Kentzsch, and others. As the main founder and core designer of Ethereum, Vitalik Buterin appeared on the edge in a relatively low profile. At just 21 years old, he and his team witnessed this historic moment that would change the blockchain world. This article is sponsored by GENG, Build Your Fortune on GENG (https://geng.one)

23d agoburnking
Loss of style and self-innovation: Jesse explains in detail why the Base Chain broke down in crypto social networking?

Loss of style and self-innovation: Jesse explains in detail why the Base Chain broke down in crypto social networking?

Source: Jessepollak, Head of Base Original title: Jesse Changwen Reflects on Base Chain: Betting on social and content tokens was completely wrong TL; DR: · Jesse Pollak acknowledged that Base's bet on developers was correct, but the strategy around social, creator, and content tokens completely failed, causing Base to lag behind in the fields of perpetual contracts, predictive markets, tokenization, and corporate payments. · Base will be repositioned as a “blockchain serving global finance,” focusing on the three directions of transactions, stablecoin payments, and AI agents in 2026. · Jesse has returned the Base App to Coinbase, taken over by Cobie, and has redirected her personal energy to the Base chain and underlying technology construction. · Base will continue to support developers through ecosystem funds, project plans, and Coinbase's distribution resources. Jesse also apologized for the previous misjudgment on content tokens, but said he would not give up $JESSE. Over the past week, there has been a lot of discussion around Base. After a week of listening to opinions and reflecting on my experiences over the past 6 months, I wanted to be honest about my views. First, if that wasn't obvious enough, then the first quarter of 2026 definitely hit us hard. In 2024 and 2025, I made two decisions that I wanted to use to push Base globally: 1. Developers will drive the next round of popularity of cryptographic applications; 2. The new wave of popularity will be driven by on-chain native social experiences, including creators, content, and messaging. In my opinion, we were right to bet on developers, but clearly wrong to bet on social. Developers have indeed promoted the next round of popularity of crypto applications, predicting that the market, perpetual contracts, and stablecoins will all develop, but social networking is not at the center of this round of growth. In fact, the entire crypto social space that many people previously co-built, including Farcaster, Zora, Mini Apps, and of course creator tokens, has completely collapsed. I was wrong. Whether it's just a mistake in judging the timing, or is the whole direction itself wrong, maybe only time can tell. For example, does $ANSEM count as a creator token? But in any case, I was definitely wrong in my judgment at the time. The collateral effects of this are quite serious. I've been suffering the consequences of these mistakes since this year. We are aware that due to its focus on the social sector, Base has fallen behind in some increasingly important key directions. We have Avantis, a perpetual contract platform, and Limitless, a prediction market, but both clearly lag behind competitors that have already formed a large scale. We also have a lot of room for improvement in making Base a truly business-friendly tokenization and payment platform. People have lost faith in Base, and bystanders on Crypto Twitter keep mentioning my mistakes almost every week. It wasn't a good feeling, and it still is. But the past decade of construction experience in this industry has taught me that when things seem worst, the best option is to focus on construction. So I started doing that too. I switched my time and attention back from the app to the Base chain, started writing code again, and launched projects such as Azul, Beryl, B20, privacy, and ledgers one after another. At the same time, I've also re-examined many of my previous assumptions: does the crypto industry have to rely on social networking to grow? Does Base require an app? Can Base grow into a larger network than Coinbase? For a long time, I thought only social products could generate enough viral growth to allow encryption to reach 1 billion people. Now, I think this judgment was also wrong. The facts have shown that a better currency alone is enough to drive the growth of the crypto industry. The development of stablecoins, prediction markets, perpetual contracts, and tokenization is proving this, and I expect this trend to accelerate. Now, my goal is to bring 1 billion people to the chain by making the global financial system really work. On the application side, my current focus is on building Base into a blockchain that serves global finance. For this reason, I have returned the Base App to Coinbase. Next, Cobie, who is now my friend, will take over and work to make it the best chain...

36d ago谢伟伦#BASE #DEX #MEME
Social experiments failed, competition approached, and Base completely switched to the financial circuit

Social experiments failed, competition approached, and Base completely switched to the financial circuit

Author: Gu Yu, ChainCatcher Original title: Base founder Jesse rarely publicly admits strategic mistakes. On July 15, Jesse Pollak, founder of Base, published a long article announcing that he would return the leadership of the Base App to Coinbase, while devoting all his energy to the Base blockchain itself, with the goal of making Base a “global financial blockchain.” Jesse will continue to lead the Base Chain, but will no longer be responsible for the Base App; the Base App will be taken over by Jordan Fish, known as Cobie in the crypto community. The most notable adjustment was not Jesse's departure from the Base App, but rather his rare admission of Base's strategic misdecisions in the social direction of the past two years. In the past, Base tried to establish itself as a consumer-grade entrance into the crypto world. From Farcaster to Zora, from creator coins to miniapps, to Base App, Base hopes to use “on-chain social + creator economy” to bring more regular users to the chain. But now, Pollak personally admits: Base bet on the right builder and misplaced the social network. This statement can almost be viewed as a phased judgment in the Base social experiment. On-chain social networking has not become the center of the next round of adoption; what really comes out is predicting markets, perpetual contracts, stablecoins, and tokenized assets. It's not that users don't want to go online; they don't want to go online for the sake of social networking itself. They are more willing to go on the chain for transactions, payments, earnings, and speculation. 1. What did Jesse say? In the long post, Jesse reviewed in detail the reflections and adjustments of the past six months. “The first quarter of 2026 was a big punch,” he confessed. Over the past two years, Base has made a two-track bet: one is believing that builders will unlock the next wave of cryptographic adoption; the other is believing that adoption will be driven by “new on-chain native social experiences” (creators, content, messages). The result: “Our bet on builders was right, but our bet on social was clearly wrong.” Builder is indeed driving a wave of adoption — predicting markets, perpetual contracts, and stablecoins as the strongest growth engines — but social networking isn't at the center. Instead, “the entire social side marketplace we've been trying to build — Farcaster, Zora, miniapps, and yes, creator tokens — has completely crashed.” He said bluntly: “I was wrong. Whether the timing is wrong... or completely wrong, only time will tell, but in any case, I'm sure it was wrong.” Collateral damage is quite serious: Base lags behind in key areas — perpetual contracts (although Avantis, etc.) and the prediction market (although Limitless, etc.) all lag behind mature competitors; there is also plenty of room for improvement in enterprise-level tokenization and payment unlocking. People lost confidence, and CT reminded him of his mistakes every week. Jesse said that this year was a practice of “eating shit.” But the lesson he learned was: when things feel the worst, the best thing to do is to bow down and build. He has refocused his attention from the app to the chain, started writing code again, introduced features such as Azul, Beryl, B20, privacy, ledger, etc., and re-examined the hypothesis: Does crypto need social networking to grow? Does Base need an app? Can Base be bigger than Coinbase? The conclusion turned clear: “Better money is enough — we're seeing this in real time through stablecoins, forecasting, perpetuity, tokenization... I'm now focusing on getting one billion people on the chain by making global finance actually work.” The three main pillars of 2026 are: winning transactions (all assets, including tokenized stocks, memes, app coins, etc.), payments (global stablecoins, effective for individuals and businesses), and proxies (AI agents accelerate everything, because encryption is the native currency of computers, AI will create trillions of new economic participants). He has returned the Base App to Coinbase, led by Cobie, and allowed it to expand beyond the Base ecosystem (something he “wouldn't like” as the leader of Base). He stressed that builders are still the cornerstone, and Base will continue to support them through Base Layer, Batches, Ecosystem Fund, etc. 2. Why is Base's social dream shattered...

37d agoburnking#AI

Base Co-Creation: Betting on on-chain social networking is wrong and will focus on transactions, payments, and AI agents

Comparing the news, Base Co-Founder Jesse Pollak wrote an article reviewing the direction of development over the past two years, admitting that its previous bet on native social networking on the chain was wrong. It said that social trends such as Farcaster, Zora, Miniapps, and creator coins failed to become the core driving force for crypto adoption, and as a result, Base lags behind some of its competitors in the fields of perpetual contracts, market forecasting, tokenization, and payments. Pollak said that in the future, Base will position itself as the “blockchain for global finance,” focusing on the three major directions of transactions, payments, and AI agents in 2026. Among them, transactions cover tokenized stocks, meme coins, and application tokens, and payments revolve around global stablecoins for individuals and enterprises. AI Agent will use cryptocurrencies as native computer currency to serve future large-scale machine economy participants. Additionally, the Base app will be returned to the Coinbase team, and Cobie will take over and possibly expand beyond the Base ecosystem. Pollak also said that Base will continue to support developers through Base Layer, Base Batches, Ecosystem Fund, and Coinbase distribution resources.

37d ago

True innovation in a bear market: Behind FOMO and ANTFUN financing, decentralized social networking is moving towards social trading

Comparing news, against the backdrop of the continued downturn in the crypto market, the two social trading apps FOMO and ANTFUN have successively received financing, or indicate that decentralized social networking is shifting from the past content social paradigm to a new form centered on transactional relationships. Among them, the US crypto trading app FOMO has successively completed Series A financing of 17 million US dollars led by Benchmark and Series B financing of 75 million US dollars led by Index Ventures and Union Square Ventures since receiving a seed round of 2 million dollars in 2025. ANTFUN, an Asian social trading wallet, recently completed a $5 million strategic round of financing through AntFun Token after receiving support from institutions such as Folkman Venture and MimStream. Decentralized social networking experiments in the past few years, represented by Farcaster, Lens, etc., essentially moved traditional social models such as Twitter and Medium to the chain, but failed to create new user behavior, so mass products were never born. By contrast, FOMO and ANTFUN are not rebuilding decentralized Twitter, but rather building social networks around transactions. Users follow real traders and friends. Their information flow consists of trading behavior, position changes, and earnings, and the transaction records themselves become new social contacts. Naturally, this model has a closed loop of commerce. User communication, following, and order posting are ultimately converted into transaction behavior, and a source of revenue is formed through processing fees, so that social networking is used to acquire customers, and transactions are monetized. In terms of product form, FOMO and ANTFUN each represent two different paths in the US and Asia. FOMO is based on the X platform network and favors open square communication; ANTFUN relies on contacts and community relationships, and places more emphasis on private networks of acquaintances.

60d ago

Former Farcaster founder and Tempo team member Dan Romero: Tempo may be decentralized within 2 years, and the head of the Asian market is already in place

Comparing the news, recently, Liu Feng, the former founder of Chainwen, and Dan Romero, the former founder of Farcaster and a member of the Tempo team, had a series of discussions on topics such as payments, cryptocurrencies, and AI agents. Among them, Dan Romero responded to some of the concerns of the outside world and Liu Feng, with the following highlights: 1. From idealistic socialfi products to large enterprise-led public chains: “The crypto world has changed, and now there are two things: stablecoins and crypto (more native)”; the goal of Tempo and Playbook is to “start with the payment business and cooperate with large and mature companies to help them develop their own business; then, in conjunction with DeFi applications, launch Revenue products, what these end users need”; 2. “Tempo doesn't have Meme coins or anything like that, which is a good thing for a conservative bank. Tempo also has other features: compliance, privacy. It's probably not that fun for crypto natives. For banks, this is very appealing”; 3. The core use cases for payments: “Platform-based marketplaces and cross-border payments are two clear stablecoin use cases”; 4. Smart payments dominated by micropayments are worth looking forward to; stablecoin-based micropayments will bring spring: payments between smart devices, “traditional payment methods are too expensive to be carried out on a large scale. This granularity and speed requirement can only be achieved through cryptocurrency and stream payments”; 5. “I really respect the cryptopunk approach that Ethereum adheres to in terms of decentralization. I really like their new mission, which is good for the world; but the reality is that companies don't care about this; they care about whether they can solve real problems”; “If Tempo can attract 1 million businesses and 1 billion consumers, it's not bad for cryptocurrency or Ethereum”; 6. Tempo's decentralization process: I hope it can be realized in two years. “We are not a bunch of outsiders in suits; we really understand how important decentralization is; we know how important decentralization is, But at the same time, we're also very pragmatic; I promise we can actually push the app forward. 7. Regarding the Machine Payment Agreement (MPP) and the X402 agreement, AI Agents don't care about the differences between the two; the key to their satisfaction is that no human intervention is required; 8. Tempo's head of the Asian market is in place and will be working in Singapore.

91d ago