Virtuals · 546
How did AI16z, the leader of AI Agent tokens in the past, come to an end?

How did AI16z, the leader of AI Agent tokens in the past, come to an end?

Author: David, Shenchao TechFlow Original title: Drowning Tide, the End of “Cryptographic XAI” pioneer ai16z, ai16z, do you remember the name? If you remember, it means you experienced the AI coin boom in the cryptocurrency industry at the end of 2024. If you don't remember, it's normal. The AI Agent token category has been quiet for a long time. Cryptography x AI seems too much like a fake concept and an old-fashioned toy in the current version of AI tools that are gradually being implemented and rapidly progressing. Today, Shaw Walters, the founder of the Eliza OS project, wrote a long, long article to the effect that the ai16z token is completely dead, the foundation is closed, there will be no repurchases, and the holders will handle it themselves. He suggests you either sell it or “get a bunch of people to fry it up,” but don't expect him to do anything more. The tone of this letter isn't like a founder politely announcing the termination of the project, but more like a person falling down the door in disappointment after scolding everyone. He called the crypto community “a bunch of used to crying bags,” saying that a law firm sued him from the standpoint of the token holder. However, the Eliza OS Foundation had no money to file a lawsuit and lost all the rest of the money. Shaw also said that he used to have 25 million dollars of AI16z tokens in his wallet, but not a single one was sold and went all the way back to zero; now he lives on his savings, lives in a small, dilapidated bedroom in San Francisco, and writes code every day. From his point of view, he probably thought he was standing in a smoky market and using idealistic colors to develop, ultimately leaving behind a heart full of ruin, disappointment, and anger. I have no intention of judging these personal feelings. However, standing at the crossroads of changing hot spots, shifting industry focus, and the rise of AI, the shutdown of Eliza OS inevitably made people feel emotional about encryption X AI. It really started early in the morning and caught up in the evening episode. One step ahead. In October 2024, ai16z launched crowdfunding on DAOS.fun. The goal is to raise 420.69 SOL, equivalent to about 75,000 US dollars, to become an investment fund managed independently by AI. 420.69. Anyone familiar with crypto culture knows this is a rough number. Starting with the selection of the amount of capital raised, the undertones of this matter have already been decided. But it actually flew. In less than three months, ai16z's market capitalization reached $2.6 billion. It also brought in an entire category. Before GOAT, after VIRTUAL, various Agent concept coins were constantly emerging, and the entire AI Agent circuit grew from zero to close to 10 billion US dollars. Cryptography is conceptually one step ahead of others. What will the AI market look like at the end of 2024? ChatGPT has just turned two, and is often criticized for answering various illusions; Claude doesn't have the tools to directly operate a computer, and most people's understanding of an “AI Agent” is still at the conceptual level. The crypto market has already set a price for this concept. But there is one detail that not many people cared about at the time. Less than a week after ai16z went live, some cryptographic media published reports questioning it, saying that the AI agent at the core of the ai16z project, the “Marc IndReessen,” which claims to be able to make independent investment decisions, is actually a person operating, not the real agent himself. This question later also occurred on AIIxBT, a well-known crypto market analysis agent. At the time, it was difficult for such questioning to cause any uproar and FUD. The market capitalization continues to rise, the community continues to shout, and new AI Agent tokens continue to be issued... Looking back, this is probably the most accurate microcosm of the entire cryptographic AI narrative. True or false, it doesn't matter. In an environment of excessive fluidity, a leading version of the narrative is enough to cause a wave of speculation. The concept is realistic, the direction is right, but the token exists before the product, and the price comes before the technology. This is the essence of cryptography being one step faster. The future has arrived, but Rain Girl won't help but in 2026, AI Agent will actually arrive. There are CodeX and Claude in the west, and Workbuddy in the east, which are more suitable for domestic physiques. Looking back at the white paper's narratives living in the hype boom of cryptographic AI, such as helping people automatically analyze market conditions, process workflows, monitor public opinion, etc., have actually completely become reality. This is probably one of the few real-world stories in the crypto industry other than stablecoins. But the people who redeemed them...

17d agoburnking#agent #AI #AI agent #token
Crypto Agent commercialization is accelerating, why are stablecoins the most critical part?

Crypto Agent commercialization is accelerating, why are stablecoins the most critical part?

Core view: For AI agents to become real economic agents, the core obstacle is that traditional payment systems cannot support their autonomous payments. Stablecoins represented by USDC, along with dedicated infrastructure launched by companies such as Coinbase, Circle, and Stripe, are building a native programmable, all-weather, small, high-frequency “currency layer” for AI agents, spawning a program-driven on-chain microeconomy. Key elements: 1. Four major barriers to traditional payments: Agents cannot pass the identity barrier (no ID card), authorization (verification code required), time (not 7 x 24 hours), and cost (high fixed processing fee), and cannot perform small-amount high-frequency transactions. 2. Native advantages of stablecoins: programmable (automatic code execution), no license (self-generated wallet), 7 x 24 hours, transparent accounts and stable value, perfect for agent payment needs. 3. Implementation practices of leading companies: Coinbase launched AgentKit and X402 protocols (more than 50 million transactions have been processed); Circle launched the CCTP cross-chain protocol and AgentStack; Stripe launched a stablecoin API and supported USDC subscription payments. 4. Typical application scenario 1 (ultra-small payment): The x402 protocol and Circle's Gateway Nanopayments achieve $0.000001 micropayments, unlocking the long-term economy of pay-per-use billing for API calls, data access, etc. 5. Typical application scenario 2 (automatic generation): AI agents can achieve “self-hematopoiesis” through yield-bearing stablecoins (such as aUSDC), cover operating costs with interest, and platforms such as Ymax can achieve 8-12% annual stablecoin returns. 6. Large-scale implementation challenges: Private key management is vulnerable to attacks (such as the Owockibot incident), gaps in compliance (agents cannot be identified), and inaccurate AI intentions may lead to irreversible financial losses. Generative AI is changing from a “chatbot” to an AI agent (AI agent) that can do things by itself. A real question then popped up: How do these silicon-based “employees” receive money and how do they pay? Traditional banking stuff — real-name authentication, manual authorization, public accounts — inherently disapproves of AI agents. One answer that is rapidly evolving is to use stablecoins (USDC, USDT, and stablecoins with interest) to create a native “currency layer” for AI. This article will break down the implementation of leading companies such as Coinbase, Circle, and Stripe in this field, while also discussing compliance and security risks. The technical infrastructure is ready, but how to drive it is still a big problem. 1. The “payment breakpoint” encountered in the commercialization of AI agents Today's AI agents are already very capable: book air tickets, write codes, adjust interfaces... but they get stuck as soon as they get to the “payment” step. Traditional payment systems are designed for humans — you have to have an ID card, enter a verification code, operate on weekdays, and have a low processing fee for each transaction. These are all barriers for agents. Specifically, traditional payment systems set up four hurdles for agents: identity barriers: opening a bank account or credit card requires an ID card, face recognition, or even bank transactions, and agents can't even pull it out. Authorization: SMS verification codes, manual confirmation, and 3D security authentication are often required during payment, and agents cannot click buttons even if they cannot receive SMS. Time limit: Banks only process transfers on weekdays and business hours, while agents work 7×24 hours. Cost barrier: Each transaction has a fixed processing fee, such as starting at 30 cents for credit cards, so the pay-per-use model of $0.001 doesn't work at all. However, the financial behavior of agents requires exactly this kind of small, high-frequency charge (such as per number of API calls, per usage). The more fundamental problem is that the entire payment system has never considered direct “program to program” transfers. Even between two technology companies, the process is often: the agent generates an order → sends an email → person approves → person logs in to online banking to transfer money → each other's financial reconciliation. The agent can only do the first two steps and the final record. The most important step, “money from A to B”, must be done by hand. Current experiments: they are all modelling...

18d ago22#AI #stablecoins #wallets

Data: CASHCAT's top 1000 addresses hold about 89.1% of the supply while holding more than 12 types of Robinhood chain tokens such as PONS

Comparative news, according to Arkham's data analysis, the total number of CASHCAT token holders exceeded 61,000, but the top 1000 addresses held a total of about 89.1% of the supply, corresponding value exceeding 40 million US dollars. These top addresses also hold other tokens on Robinhood Chain, mainly PONS ($2.84 million), TENDIES ($1.87 million), STONKBROKER ($1.1 million), Index ($1.07 million), WOOD ($490,000), SQUEEZE ($314,000), VIRTUAL ($308,000), JUGGERNAUT ($299,000), UP ($275,000), DEGEN ($247,000), KITSU ($229,000), SWOGE ($211,000), VEX ($207,000), etc.

29d ago
Social experiments failed, competition approached, and Base completely switched to the financial circuit

Social experiments failed, competition approached, and Base completely switched to the financial circuit

Author: Gu Yu, ChainCatcher Original title: Base founder Jesse rarely publicly admits strategic mistakes. On July 15, Jesse Pollak, founder of Base, published a long article announcing that he would return the leadership of the Base App to Coinbase, while devoting all his energy to the Base blockchain itself, with the goal of making Base a “global financial blockchain.” Jesse will continue to lead the Base Chain, but will no longer be responsible for the Base App; the Base App will be taken over by Jordan Fish, known as Cobie in the crypto community. The most notable adjustment was not Jesse's departure from the Base App, but rather his rare admission of Base's strategic misdecisions in the social direction of the past two years. In the past, Base tried to establish itself as a consumer-grade entrance into the crypto world. From Farcaster to Zora, from creator coins to miniapps, to Base App, Base hopes to use “on-chain social + creator economy” to bring more regular users to the chain. But now, Pollak personally admits: Base bet on the right builder and misplaced the social network. This statement can almost be viewed as a phased judgment in the Base social experiment. On-chain social networking has not become the center of the next round of adoption; what really comes out is predicting markets, perpetual contracts, stablecoins, and tokenized assets. It's not that users don't want to go online; they don't want to go online for the sake of social networking itself. They are more willing to go on the chain for transactions, payments, earnings, and speculation. 1. What did Jesse say? In the long post, Jesse reviewed in detail the reflections and adjustments of the past six months. “The first quarter of 2026 was a big punch,” he confessed. Over the past two years, Base has made a two-track bet: one is believing that builders will unlock the next wave of cryptographic adoption; the other is believing that adoption will be driven by “new on-chain native social experiences” (creators, content, messages). The result: “Our bet on builders was right, but our bet on social was clearly wrong.” Builder is indeed driving a wave of adoption — predicting markets, perpetual contracts, and stablecoins as the strongest growth engines — but social networking isn't at the center. Instead, “the entire social side marketplace we've been trying to build — Farcaster, Zora, miniapps, and yes, creator tokens — has completely crashed.” He said bluntly: “I was wrong. Whether the timing is wrong... or completely wrong, only time will tell, but in any case, I'm sure it was wrong.” Collateral damage is quite serious: Base lags behind in key areas — perpetual contracts (although Avantis, etc.) and the prediction market (although Limitless, etc.) all lag behind mature competitors; there is also plenty of room for improvement in enterprise-level tokenization and payment unlocking. People lost confidence, and CT reminded him of his mistakes every week. Jesse said that this year was a practice of “eating shit.” But the lesson he learned was: when things feel the worst, the best thing to do is to bow down and build. He has refocused his attention from the app to the chain, started writing code again, introduced features such as Azul, Beryl, B20, privacy, ledger, etc., and re-examined the hypothesis: Does crypto need social networking to grow? Does Base need an app? Can Base be bigger than Coinbase? The conclusion turned clear: “Better money is enough — we're seeing this in real time through stablecoins, forecasting, perpetuity, tokenization... I'm now focusing on getting one billion people on the chain by making global finance actually work.” The three main pillars of 2026 are: winning transactions (all assets, including tokenized stocks, memes, app coins, etc.), payments (global stablecoins, effective for individuals and businesses), and proxies (AI agents accelerate everything, because encryption is the native currency of computers, AI will create trillions of new economic participants). He has returned the Base App to Coinbase, led by Cobie, and allowed it to expand beyond the Base ecosystem (something he “wouldn't like” as the leader of Base). He stressed that builders are still the cornerstone, and Base will continue to support them through Base Layer, Batches, Ecosystem Fund, etc. 2. Why is Base's social dream shattered...

37d agoburnking#AI

CASHCAT opens up hundreds of millions of dollars in valuation space, and Robinhood's on-chain capital accelerates the pricing of meme coins

Comparative news, according to GMGN monitoring, Robinhood Chain's ecological meme coin leader CASHCAT now has a market capitalization of $169 million, up 12.6% in 24 hours. With the market capitalization of hundreds of millions of dollars as the leader stabilized, on-chain capital rotated to the second tier, and competition for the second seat gradually heated up. Today, some tokens recorded high gains. The specific performance is as follows: JUGGERNAUT: The market capitalization was reported at US$12.5 million, down 8.6% in 24 hours, and the turnover reached US$3.8 million during the same period. Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev's personal meme image previously mentioned in X's reply, temporarily ranked first in the second-tier market capitalization. VEX: Market capitalization was reported at $9 million, up 90.9% in 24 hours, with a turnover of $3.5 million over the same period. It is an AI trading agency project distributed through Virtuals. Driven by the Robinhood ChainAI native and Agentic Trading narrative, it became the highest grossing project in the second tier today. WISHBONE: The market capitalization was $8.5 million, up 49.7% in 24 hours, with a turnover of $2.3 million over the same period. It was initiated by the CTO of SKI, a token with a market capitalization of hundreds of millions of dollars on the Base chain, and superimposed the movie dog Wishbone as Robin Hood's cultural stalker. The funding mainly revolved around the team's historical results and the anticipated pricing of Robinhood's native Dogecoin. Note: Meme coin transactions are highly volatile, mostly dependent on market sentiment and conceptual hype, and have no actual value or use cases. Investors should be aware of risks.

39d ago

Over $7.2 billion in assets migrated from LayerZero to Chainlink CCIP

According to CoinDesk, Mantle announced that it will migrate its Super Portal, which was jointly developed with Bybit and has a locked value of 2.5 billion dollars, from LayerZero's OFT standard to Chainlink's CCT standard. The migration window will be from July 9 to 15. During this period, Super Portal will be suspended, and existing MNT assets and related activities on Byreal and Bybit will not be affected. The migration saw LayerZero's total assets flow to Chainlink CCIP surpass $7.24 billion. Previously, Kelp ($1.5 billion), Lombard (over $1 billion), Solv Protocol ($700 million), Virtuals Protocol ($700 million), Re ($475 million), Kraken ($330 million), and Yuzu Money ($54.5 million) have completed migrations.

44d ago#On-chain dynamics

Binance Alpha will remove multiple currencies on June 30

According to the official announcement, based on the latest review, the following tokens do not meet Binance Alpha standards and will be removed from the recommended list at 10:30 (UTC) on June 30, 2026: TTD (TradeTide), OIK (SpaceNation), LUNAI (LunaByVirtuals), TOWN (Alt.TOWN), VINU (VitaInU), PUP (PUP), CYPR (Cypher), DGRAM ( DatagramNetwork). Users can still withdraw or sell these tokens on Binance Alpha after removal. This article is sponsored by GENG, Build Your Fortune on GENG (https://geng.one)

53d agoburnking

Binance will adjust leverage and collateral ratios for several contracts

According to the official announcement, Binance will update the collateral rate and tiered collateral ratio of PortfolioMargin and PortfolioMarginPro on June 26, 2026 at 14:00 (East Zone 8 time), involving assets such as ADA, TRX, DOT, ARB, OP, ENA, and VIRTUAL. Meanwhile, Binance Futures will adjust the leverage and margin tiers for U-standard perpetual contracts such as BICOUSDT, ANIMEUSDT, WCTUSDT, 1000SATSUSDT, ZKCUSDT, BASEDUSDT, DOODUSDT, PLAYUSDT, TNSRUSDT, SOPHUSDT, and SIGNUSDT at 14:30 (East 8th Zone Time) on June 26, 2026.

59d ago

Aave subsidiary Push was approved by the FCA to become a UK crypto trading service provider

According to Twitter, Push Labs Ltd and Push Virtual Assets Ltd, a British subsidiary of Aave Labs, have been approved by the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to register as local crypto asset trading service providers. According to Aave, these licenses enable Push to carry out regulated crypto assets and payment-related businesses in the UK, and support the launch of zero-fee stablecoin deposit and withdrawal products. In addition to crypto asset registration, Push has also been approved to issue electronic money under electronic money regulations. The two companies have been assigned FCA registration numbers 1031720 and 1031721 respectively, and the anti-money laundering regulations are subject to the “2017 Anti-Money Laundering and Fund Transfer Regulations”.

86d ago

Base MCP is officially launched

Comparatively, according to official news, Base MCP has officially launched. Users can connect their Base accounts to the AI interface to perform exchanges, transfers, track portfolios, and participate in the Base ecosystem via chat. Once launched, the service supports Morpho, Moonwell, Aerodrome, Bankr, Avantis, Virtuals, and Uniswap, covering the fields of lending, exchange, and perpetual contracts. Users can install an MCP-enabled AI client and authenticate using a Base account, and all transactions initiated by AI agents require manual confirmation or cancellation by the user. Base MCP builds authentication based on the OAuth 2.1 standard, generates a wallet request link through the storage request function, and the MCP server does not hold or access the user's private key.

88d ago