通证设计 · 17
Regulatory turning point? SEC Releases New Guidelines for Registering and Reporting Crypto Assets

Regulatory turning point? SEC Releases New Guidelines for Registering and Reporting Crypto Assets

Author: Blockchain Knight On April 10, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Finance Department released new employee opinions outlining how federal securities laws apply to the registration and issuance of Crypto-related securities. The statement covered a range of topics, including how the company should present information on its business operations, token design, governance, technical specifications, and financial reporting. Although the document does not establish new regulations, it reflects current expectations of SEC staff about how companies should prepare filings. It also shows that the SEC is taking a more open attitude towards crypto regulation under the new leadership. Providing more clear guidance to registrants The guidance focuses on filing documents submitted under the 1933 Securities Act and the 1934 Securities Exchange Act to assist platform entities involved in token issuance or construction based on blockchain infrastructure. These filings may include registration forms such as Form S-1 for public offerings, Form 10 for reporting companies, Form 20-F for foreign issuers, and Form 1-A for Regulation A exemptions. The company should clearly outline its revenue strategy, project milestones, and the technical framework behind any relevant digital assets. If Crypto assets have a specific function in the business, such as supporting transactions, governance, or access to services, this information must be described in plain language. The SEC also expects these descriptions to be consistent with what is shared in promotional materials such as white papers and developer documentation. If development is ongoing, the statement suggests that the company outline key milestones, expected timelines, funding sources, and any role the token or network will play after launch. This includes an explanation of consensus mechanisms, transaction fees, and whether the network uses open source or proprietary software. Disclosure requirements The SEC also set out expectations for disclosure of investment risks, including token volatility, liquidity restrictions, legal classifications, and security gaps. For example, if a company's business model relies on a third-party blockchain or other external network, these dependencies should be described. The same applies to any arrangement with a market maker or custodian. The issuer must disclose whether the token has voting rights, profit sharing mechanisms, or redemption procedures, and how these rights are communicated or modified. The document also requires details on how the token was created, whether the supply is fixed, and whether a vesting period or lockdown period applies. If a smart contract controls token behavior, the code must be submitted as an attachment, and any updates to it should be reflected in future revisions. Additionally, the company must describe how token ownership is tracked, the tools required to transfer assets, and any costs associated with these transfers. Companies must also disclose information about leadership and key personnel, including individuals or entities that may play a central role in decision-making but do not hold an official title. For trust or exchange traded products, the disclosure should include information about the sponsor and its management. Financial disclosures must follow established accounting standards, and the SEC encourages companies facing new reporting situations to consult their chief accountant's office. Although this staff guidance is not binding, it provides a point of reference for Crypto-related entities during the registration process. It reflects the SEC's growing focus on the crypto market as more companies seek to operate in the open market and raise capital through blockchain-based products...

498d agoburnking#SEC #cryptocurrency #custodial #Asset registration
Among the four kings of Ethereum Layer 2, is ZK more cost-effective?

Among the four kings of Ethereum Layer 2, is ZK more cost-effective?

Author: Tina Editor: ZkSync, another Heavenly King project, is online. This is the last project of the Four Heavenly Kings of Ethereum Layer 2 to go live. The launch of Arb, OP, and STRK has benefited a number of airdrop partners, and the high-profile zkSync airdrop distribution plan has settled. The airdrop opened for applications at 15:00 p.m. on June 17, and trading platforms such as Binance and Gate have already traded ZK tokens. As the last project to go live among the four kings of Ethereum L2, zkSync has received a lot of attention from the market. 1. Introduction to the zkSync project zkSync was founded in 2019. It is an Ethereum Layer 2 extension solution developed by Matter Labs that preserves the security attributes of the underlying blockchain by using the latest generation of simple zero-knowledge proofs. All funds in zkSync are held by smart contracts on the main chain, while computation and storage transactions are performed off-chain. For each Rollup block, a zero-knowledge proof of state transition (SNARK) is generated and verified by the main chain contract. This SNARK includes proof of the validity of every transaction in the Rollup block. As we all know, in the Four Kings of Layer 2 projects, Arbitrum and Optimism are optimistic rollup (optimistic rollup) proof technology solutions, while StarkNet and zkSync are zero-knowledge proof solutions. Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin is more positive about zero-knowledge proof in Ethereum's second-tier expansion scheme. He has stated that Optimistic Rollup would be a transitional solution, while Zero Knowledge Rollup (Zero Knowledge Rollup) is the ultimate scaling solution for Ethereum. 2. According to data from the rootdata platform, ZkSync investors have completed a total of 4 rounds of financing, and the total amount of financing reached 258 million US dollars. Let's compare the financing amounts to the other three of the four major kings of Ethereum: Arbitrum raised a total of $143.7 million; Optimism raised a total of $429.5 million; and StarkNet raised a total of $261 million. As can be seen, zkSync's funding amount is lower than Optimism and StarkNet, and higher than Arbitrum. As a star project, zkSync brings together many top investment teams in the coin industry. For example, institutions such as a16z, Coinbase, and OKX have participated in the project's investment. 3. ZK Token Token Design The token name of the zkSync project is ZK, and the total supply of tokens is 21 billion. Among them, the number of airdropped tokens accounted for 17.5%. Airdrop snapshot date: March 24, 2024. The claim dates for airdrop tokens are: June 24, 2024 to January 3, 2025. The specific distribution plan for ZK tokens is as follows: 1) 66.6% of ZK tokens will be distributed to the community. Of these, 17.5% of the tokens (about 3.675 billion) will be airdropped and analyzed to the community at one time, and users will continue to receive tokens until January 3, 2025. The rest (49.1%) will be distributed over time through an ecosystem plan managed by the zkSync Foundation and the ZK Nation governance process to support an ecosystem that continues to grow as new users go online, specifically: Ecosystem Uptake: 19.9%; Token Assembly: 29.3%. 2) 33.3% of the total supply is distributed to investors and Matter Labs, of which: 17.2% is distributed to investors; 16.1% is distributed to Matter Labs teams. The tokens distributed to investors and teams will be locked for the first year and then unlocked for 3 years between June 2025 and June 2028. Judging from the ZK token's Unlocks schedule, the next big unlock will be in June 2025, so there's no need to worry about big solutions in the last year...

783d ago世链投研#zkSync #Ethereum
Cipholio Ventures 2022 Annual Report: Capturing investment trends from the evolution of the top 5 crypto vertices

Cipholio Ventures 2022 Annual Report: Capturing investment trends from the evolution of the top 5 crypto vertices

Original title: Annual Report 2022: Capture investment trends from evolutions of 5 major crypto vertices Author: 0x_Jonas, Cipholio Ventures Source: medium Compilation: MarsBit Background After the core DeFi and NFT narrative cycles disappeared, the entire crypto market seemed to lack endogenous growth momentum. The entire industry has been hit hard, especially after experiencing the double whammy of Terra and FTX: confidence in internal practitioners is shaken, and the outside world faces stricter regulation. Is the crypto market really “weak” from an investor's perspective? This article disassembles and studies the five major vertical fields of L1/L2, DeFi, Gaming, NFT, and Social, analyzes the competitive landscape in different vertical fields, and attempts to abstract the core structure and possible future development direction of this field, thereby clarifying the investment logic of the racetrack. At the end of the article, Cipholio Ventures' understanding of the market cycle and core investment arguments were also explained. 1. The first thing L1/L2 mentions is the core infrastructure of blockchain: the public chain. As the source of innovation and the foundation of the superstructure of the entire industry, the public chain has never lacked the popularity and favor of capital since its inception. With the continuous evolution and development of the public chain ecosystem, we can roughly outline the current competitive pattern as “one super four”. It's no surprise that the superpower is the “king” Ethereum. With its current technological maturity and ecological prosperity, no other chain can shake its position as king. However, due to the explosive growth of Dapps, the development process of Ethereum did not go smoothly, causing the Layer 1 network to become congested, which in turn pushed up transaction costs. High transaction costs will hinder the large-scale adoption of Ethereum, leading to the core problem surrounding the development of the entire public chain: expansion. The history of public chain development is the development history of Ethereum in solving the expansion problem. Regarding “how to adopt blockchain technology on a large scale,” different public chains have formed different ideas and solutions under different divisions of labor, and have gradually evolved into the current “top four” competition pattern. Simply put, we can divide existing mainstream public chains into four quadrants based on whether they support EVM and can be decomposed, roughly divided into four categories. The first is the monolithic EVM chain, represented by BSC/Polygon/Avalanche in the upper left corner, commonly known as Ethereum Forks. At the beginning of their establishment, Ethereum's core architecture had more or less improvements in terms of technology, such as the number of validators, consensus mechanisms, etc., so there were also some improvements in terms of performance. Similar innovators, on the other hand, did not break the monolithic architecture while still retaining the EVM environment. Such changes enable developers to seamlessly migrate both at the development level and in terms of user experience, thereby greatly carrying spillover users who want to experience dApps but cannot afford Ethereum's high GAS fees, and lowering the threshold for using Dapps. To a certain extent, this change has enabled public chains other than Ethereum to continue the “DeFi Summer.” However, due to the market cycle, Ethereum's own gas is relatively low, lowering the user experience threshold to a certain extent. At the same time, most innovation in native applications still occurs on Ethereum, so the Ethereum fork chain is currently facing serious problems such as TVL outflow, insufficient innovation, and loss of users. The second type is a modular chain that also supports EVM, which is commonly known as a Layer 2 expansion scheme. As a horizontal extension of Ethereum, Layer 2 enhances the overall operating efficiency of Ethereum through an architecture that separates the execution layer. The development of Layer 2 has gone through technical iterations of Channel, Plasma, and Rollups, to proposed hybrid solutions such as Validium and Volition. Currently, the solutions receiving the most attention in the market are mainly Rollups, and the mainstream segmentation solutions include ZK and OP leading the market. However, due to the difficulty of the algorithm and the slow development process of the ZK system due to EVM equivalent compatibility issues, OP system solutions represented by Arbitrum and Optimism have the upper hand in terms of technical maturity and ecological application. The third one follows the complete opposite path from Layer 2, the so-called “Ethereum killer.” They abandoned Ethereum's current development path and took a different approach. The most intuitive improvement was to execute Ethereum itself in parallel...

1344d agody zhang#DeFi #FTX #NFTs #Terra #WEB3 #Ethereum
Yield Guild Games: Community Update - Q2 2022

Yield Guild Games: Community Update - Q2 2022

This article will share the highlights of the Yield Guild Games (YGG) Q2 2022 community update, including the guild's continued development in the eSports sector, the latest partnerships, and the transition to a Swiss association. The following are highlights that the Guild has achieved as it enters the new construction season. To learn more, read YGG's Q2 2022 Community Update Report in full: https://storage.googleapis.com/external_communication/YGG-2022Q2-CommunityUpdate.pdf电竞YGG believes in the power of a strong esports ecosystem in blockchain gaming and is excited about the guild's dominance in this field. We are proud of our competitive players, who represented their guild at Axie Infinity Retreat (AIR) Las Vegas, Axie Infinity's biggest online and offline competition to date. YGG elite player Itachity took first place, while Elm0Momo and BigGabbie finished second and fourth respectively. YGG's Axie Infinity charity e-sports tournament, the YGG Manager's Cup, recently entered the championship phase, with YGG e-sports players Lev0x and YGG Elite competing for the championship. YGG Elite won a grand prize of $35,000 from FTX, the official sponsor of the tournament. The prize money will be donated to Gentle Hands, a child and youth welfare agency in the Philippines. Video: https://twitter.com/YieldGuild/status/1553640353575489536?s=20&t=m1wBQZs-jhyZEBd4Y1PqTQ同时,我们的 61 scholarship managers also launched the YGG Student Tournament, an Axie Infinity esports competition held among YGG students to experience the competitive environment, hone their skills, and inspire them in the future Join other contests. YGG Swiss Association YGG moved to its new home, a Swiss association called “Yield Guild Games”, and achieved significant success. Here are some of the key reasons for this move: 1. Limited liability between YGG members. As time goes on, YGG will welcome all token holders as members of the Association. This will enable token holders not only to have clear rights within the association, but also to have a better legal position within the organization and in terms of protecting themselves. 2. Flexibility to structure committees and subcommittees for community participation. The transition to a Swiss association enabled YGG to innovate its charters relating to the proposals and votes of committee and subcommittee members. This structure closely reflects the DAO's goals and will be gradually refined by YGG. 3. An opportunity to merge YGG's SubDAO as a sub-association. As a sub-association, SubDAO still enjoys significant autonomy, but does not require extensive YGG-related legal documentation, thereby allowing the YGG Association and all of its sub-associations to form a clearly defined YGG ecosystem. Ultimately, this move will put YGG and its SubDAO in a better position to gradually decentralize the entire YGG network. As YGG SEA (Southeast Asia), IndiGG (India), Ola GG (global Hispanic community), and BAYZ (Brazil) continue to gain traction in their respective markets, the YGG network welcomed a new regional SubDAO this quarter: YGG Japan. Each of these subDAOs has its own rules, funding, and leadership team, and they bridge the diverse needs of YGG and the global gamer community. To establish closer collaboration, regional bodies will regularly hold round tables as part of the YGG ecosystem. They'll discuss status updates, financials and metrics, game acquisitions and partnerships, and product plans. Scholarship YGG has been taking steps to further enrich the reward earning potential of active learners, partnering with management to redistribute NFTs to active users so that they...

1475d agoYield Guild Games#YGG #Yield Guild Games
Litentry announces parachain auction strategy, 20 million LIT prize pool, plus PNS domain

Litentry announces parachain auction strategy, 20 million LIT prize pool, plus PNS domain

Overview of the Litentry Crowdloan mechanism With the start of the Polka parachain auction, the Litentry Crowdloan campaign is currently underway. Litentry will participate in Polkadot's first slot auction and bid for all five slots until the auction is successful. In this auction, LitEntry will use 20% of the total supply of LIT to reward our auction supporters, as well as additional 10% early bird rewards, 10% status mission rewards, and failure compensation mechanisms. By bidding for parachain card slots, Litentry parachains will be connected to the Polka relay chain to obtain the security and interoperability of its network. This auction has a strategic role in Litentry's Aggregated Identity Protocol in becoming the industry standard for decentralized identity and the foundational core of Web3. Crowdloan basic rewards Basic rewards: 20 million LIT bonus pool card slot rental period (parchain rental period): 96 weeks Target card slots: #1 - #5Crowdloan capped: 8 million DOT reward pool: 20 million LIT (20% of total supply) Crowdloan campaign deadline: December 17, 2021 Minimum contribution: 5 DOT reward ratio: ≥ 2.5 LIT/DOT, meaning for every 5 DOT locked, participants will receive at least 12.5 LIT The reward. The final reward will be calculated as a percentage of each participant's contribution to the crowdfunding pool, and rewards = (your DOT contribution/total DOT contribution) * 20 million LIT reward distribution: LIT's rewards will be distributed linearly in each block. Distribution will begin once the Litentry sub-chain is running on the Polkadot relay chain and will end when the sub-chain slot expires (after 96 weeks). Early bird bonus (up to +10%) Users who participate before November 18 will receive an additional 10% bonus; users who participate from November 18 to November 25 will receive an additional 5% bonus. This early-bird bonus only applies to contributions made through polkadot.js, bifrost, parallel, and Litentry Crowdloan webapps. Status quest-related rewards (up to +10%) LitEntry has set aside a prize pool of 2 million litres to give crowdloan participants an additional 10% reward for completing identity-related tasks. These status quests will be announced gradually. The reason for designing identity-related tasks is that we want users to be aware that identity is important, economically valuable, and usable. These tasks will then be integrated into the Litentry dApp, giving it an aggregated identity. Auction failure compensation If Litentry doesn't win the auction in the first batch, Litentry will use additional LIT to reimburse previous contributors in a new round of crowdfunding activities until Litentry wins the auction. The compensation ratio is DOT:LIT = 1:0.12. The expected compensation APY is 13% (the Crowdloan period is about 5 weeks). If Litentry successfully obtains a slot, no compensation will be distributed on Polkadot until Litentry wins a Parchain slot CrowdLoan channels currently participate in the Litentry Crowdloan channel currently has the following main channels: Partners help reward Polkadot Name System contributions Litentry auctions parachain card slots to give.dot domains to Litentry CrowdLoan contributors. As long as users participate in the Litentry CrowdLoan and the contribution value exceeds 10 dot, they can receive a domain name of their choice. Currently, the event only supports users who participate in a decentralized manner. For event details, please visit https://prelaunch.pns.link/SubDAO助力Litentry竞拍平行链卡槽,为Litentry CrowdLoan contributors airdrop a total of 10,000 GOVs. For event details, please visit: https://twitter.com/litentry/status/1455899519460069380支持Litentry的理由低市场风险. The biggest advantage of the Litentry Crowdloan program is that participants are exposed to relatively little risk. Polkadot card slot...

1739d agoPolkaWorld#DOT #PolkaWorld
Why DOT's token design is sustainable and maximizes community benefits

Why DOT's token design is sustainable and maximizes community benefits

Author: Web3 Foundation Research Scientist Samuel Häfner Web3 Foundation research team's latest research on utility tokens shows that unlike centralized web2 platforms that focus on platform benefits, decentralized utility token ecosystems are generally more efficient, thereby providing optimal services to all ecosystem participants. The study also highlighted the conflict of the “utility token impossible triangle” and proved that Boca's utility token model is sustainable, thereby optimising the entire community of online participants. According to FINMA's February 2018 guide, a utility token is “a token designed to provide digital access to an application or service through blockchain-based infrastructure.” The service provided by Polkadot consists of parachain slots, which have shared security and technical means of communicating with other parachains in the network. To get one of these slots, users (teams built on Boca) need to stake DOT to participate in recurring auctions. For many utility token-based projects, the most common practice is to have each utility token native to its own blockchain. This means that these tokens are needed not only when consuming services, but also when motivating network nodes to provide consensus services. This dual role raises delicate design issues, which I also discussed in my recent research paper “Utility Token Design”: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3954773. In this paper, I analyzed the dynamic general equilibrium model of the proof-of-of-stake blockchain's native utility token. In the past, the dynamic general equilibrium model was used to explain supply and demand relationships in an overall economy. The utility token market and the economy as a whole share some characteristics because they all have their own users, producers (mainly network nodes that “produce” blockchain security), and incentives. I have mainly observed the dynamic principles of utility tokens from two aspects. First, I found that the utility token system usually works because it leads to the optimal distribution of services in society. Second, I discovered a conflict between the dynamic principles of the value of utility tokens, the evolution of the services provided, and the motivational details of users. This section of the model describes the theoretical framework of a general utility token ecosystem. Readers who aren't interested in technical details can skip ahead and go directly to the next section where the conclusions are discussed. I built a dynamic model of utility tokens on a bilateral platform. A platform is a special kind of marketplace that aims to bring together different types of market participants to enable them to realize online benefits. Traditional platforms include UBER (matching drivers and passengers) and Amazon Marketplace (matching sellers and buyers). In my model, the platform is responsible for developing and maintaining software (commonly known as a runtime in blockchain terminology), which is required to provide services, and is run by validators. To cover the cost of doing so, the platform needed to repeatedly sell utility tokens on the market. One aspect I'm considering is that the platform has a fixed number of users who reuse tokens to spend some services. Consumption is competitive, and the share of consumption benefits obtained by one user in the total tokens provided by all users is constantly increasing. Basically, the throughput of any blockchain network is limited, but the more tokens you hold, the higher your chances of getting a service result, such as a parachain slot on Polkadot. On the other hand, there are a fixed number of validators who are rewarded for providing security and need to sell part of the rewards over and over to cover the costs. However, validators never want to give up all of their tokens. They faced a trade-off as their share of rewards increased their share of the total token holdings of all validators. This reflects the proof-of-stake nature of the blockchain: the rewards you get as a validator are directly proportional to your share of the network. The model assumes that the token ecosystem is in long-term equilibrium. This means that the number of participants on the network remains the same over time, and there is no speculative use of tokens. In other words, the token is only used to consume the platform's services. The resulting utility token value plays an important role in this scenario because it requires balancing user and validator incentives. If today's price is too high compared to tomorrow's, then users will only buy a few tokens to enjoy the service, validators can't cover their infrastructure costs, and the network will crash. On the other hand, if today's prices are too low compared to tomorrow's, then...

1740d agoPolkaWorld#DOT #PolkaWorld
The final batch of final projects has been announced. Stay tuned for the 2021 million blockchain hackathon finals!

The final batch of final projects has been announced. Stay tuned for the 2021 million blockchain hackathon finals!

Registration and project submission for the 2021 Million Blockchain Hackathon ended on September 30. After careful review and screening by the jury, congratulations to the following 13 projects successfully obtained the final batch of passes for the 2021 Million Blockchain Hackathon finals! AmaraLinkAmaraLink is a data cross-chain bridge that supports multi-signature threshold technology and aims to be a hub for linking Polkadot and other chains. Currently, Amaralink is actively developing a cross-chain bridge between Moonriver and Polygon/Ethereum. Taishang non-homogenized token card pack-Taishang non-homogenized token renderer Taishang non-homogenized token card pack-Taishang non-homogenized token renderer is committed to improving the infrastructure of on-chain/off-chain resolvers for non-homogenized tokens, and simultaneously developing Taishang non-homogenized token packages connected to the resolver and based on Scaffold-Eth. It targets the next generation of non-homogenized token paradigms such as Loot and n (N) to explore the limitless possibilities of non-homogenized tokens. Dmail NetworkDmail is the first email application developed based on Web 3.0 and Dfinity technology, and also supports non-homogenized tokens and distributed storage functions. By helping users achieve information transmission between traditional mailboxes and blockchain mailboxes, the application and development threshold of blockchain is lowered. CCC (Crowd Created Canvas) CCC (Crowd Created Canvas) is a decentralized creation project based on Dfinity (Internet Computer) to decentralize non-homogenous token creation. Current functional features include: users create canvases through decentralization and collaboration, and store painting creation and transaction data in IC containers. D-Trusts distributed data trust D-Trusts provides a forward-looking distributed data trust solution for data resources based on blockchain, private computing, and smart contracts. It proposes a creative framework system for the ownership, use, revenue, and operation rights of data within a legal and compliant legal framework, and leads the management of data resources throughout the life cycle. Protect data privacy and security, return data ownership and data inheritance rights to users, manage the life cycle of data in an orderly manner, and orderly flow of data value. While making data profitable, it also provides monetary pricing support to the data value chain. ICP123ICP123 is a one-stop platform in the Dfinity ecosystem that focuses on creating high-quality experiences. It is committed to exploring high-quality projects and promoting the growth of the IC ecosystem. The expected features include but are not limited to the ICP ecosystem platform, ICP application data interface, Airdrops module, Grant module, etc. Oasis Protocol Labs is a blockchain+cloud gaming metaverse ecosystem interconnection project. It will combine blockchain features, change the existing cloud gaming model, build an on-chain cloud gaming ecosystem where the three parties of computing power, users, and content providers work together, and use FileCoin's IPFS technology to store data required for cloud gaming and metaverse ecosystems. Separate the four core elements of computing power, storage, interaction, and verification, and reduce multi-party costs. Build a cloud gaming model with lightweight terminals, professional rendering node operation, low energy consensus protocol node verification, and gradually improve ecological infrastructure to finally achieve a decentralized on-chain metaverse. Digital Immortality Digital Immortality is committed to providing users with permanent photo or video storage, and can forge their photos or videos stored in IPFS into non-homogenized tokens, or forge their own electronic art works into non-homogenized tokens. DFIROCKS by RockStudiodFiRocks is committed to building a non-homogenized token customization service platform. On this platform, users can participate in the entire forging process of NTF and use the user address as a random number to limit initial model forging, thus creating a closed loop of non-homogenized token design driven by user data. Non-homogenized Token Gaga Non-Homogenized Token GAGA is an open distribution plan for non-homogenized tokens based on Dfinity. Users can issue their own non-homogenized token early-bird badges by uploading their own logo to obtain their own D...

1773d ago万向区块链#Universal blockchain
Learn about Boca's inflation in one article

Learn about Boca's inflation in one article

Sophisticated algorithms and deductions have enabled Boca's inflation model to balance the interests of the entire network, while also ensuring the healthy development of the Boca network. “Boca Knowledge Map” is our entry-level article on Boca from zero to one. We try to start with the most basic part of Boca and provide you with comprehensive information about Boca. Of course, this is a huge project and full of challenges. However, we hope that through such efforts, everyone can correctly understand Boca, and that people who don't know Boca can easily and quickly grasp Boca related knowledge. Today is the 12th issue of this column. Through a short article, I will take you to understand what is going on with inflation in the Boca Network. Boca DOT is the native token of the Boca Network. It can be nominated, voted on by community governance, and distributed by parachains. The initial circulation of DOT cards was 10 million. In August 2020, the DOT denomination was split. Therefore, the initial total circulation of the new DOT token is 1 billion, and then it will be issued more every year, and the total amount is unlimited. So the question is, how do you increase Boca sales, and how do you control the inflation rate? How does Boca inflate Boca inflates a portion of DOT through inflation and targets these DOT to specific groups of people to support participants in maintaining the Boca network and the construction of the ecosystem. As we mentioned before, Boca uses NPoS to nominate proof of interest to reach consensus. There are two roles: nominator and validator. They become nominees through staking (staking) tokens and then nominate trustworthy validators. Validators receive rewards by running nodes and confirming blocks. This reward comes from the issuance of additional tokens, which has led to inflation. Furthermore, Boca's treasury is a fund pool for ecological construction formed by combining part of inflated DOT, DOT that has been slashed (cut) by the system due to misconduct, and part of transaction fees to stimulate ecological development. Staking rewards and the Boca Treasury are the main sources of capital after the Botoons inflation. The complete inflation of Boca is mainly composed of the following components: (i1) inflation that rewards validators and nominees through the issuance of additional tokens; (i2) inflation caused by issuing additional tokens to the treasury; (i3) deflation due to misconduct, that is, slashing (reduction), and (i4) deflation caused by transaction fees. The formula is: inflation rate = i1+i2-i3-i4, and i1 also accounts for the largest share of inflation caused by validators and nominees that require additional token issuance, and is the main factor in overall inflation. To understand this consensus more clearly, we need to understand the treasury mechanism more clearly. The i2 part of the treasury mainly goes to the i1 and i2 parts, but in addition to inflation funds, the treasury also includes i3 and i4, and the treasury will destroy some unused funds (this is also the only burning mechanism for the entire Boca), but i3 and i4 are not originally part of the inflation part, so i1+i2 is equivalent to double counting i3 and i4. So we have to subtract i3 and i4 from here. Therefore, Boca's inflation rate is less than 10% because part of the DOT was burned through the treasury mechanism. The best pledge rate design for the inflation portion of DOT will be rewarded to staking participants, and the other part will go to the treasury, so how are these two distributed? This brings up Boca's design for one of the best collateral rates. Boca hopes to reasonably guide the amount of DOT pledged, guarantee the security of the network consensus, and achieve good token liquidity. Through sophisticated algorithms, under conditions where the inflation rate is 10%, it is determined that the optimal pledge rate is 50%, that is, half of the tokens are pledged in the consensus system. From this, it can be roughly divided into three situations: 1. When the pledge rate is less than 50%, the security of the network consensus is impaired, and more tokens need to be encouraged to be pledged. At this time, the annual yield is greater than 20% 2, and when the pledge rate is equal to 50%, the verification node's annual yield is 20% 3. When the pledge rate is greater than 50%, the liquidity of the token weakens. The X axis of the encouraged redemption token is the pledge rate. The Y axis indicates the annualized inflation rate. The blue line indicates the annualized inflation rate. Tokens generate an inflation rate, and the green line guarantees annualized returns rate. So, how much will Boca's Staking annualized Yield actually be? From a theoretical point of view, for staking people, the highest annualized yield of staking can be obtained is when the pledge rate is exactly equal to 50%. At this point, the annualized yield of the node is 20...

1795d agody zhang#Polkadot Ecological Research Institute #staking #Boca #Pass #inflationary
TI Rating Report - UENC

TI Rating Report - UENC

1. Project introduction UENC is an expandable basic public chain with cross-chain technology as its technical direction. The main technologies and features used include: · dPoW (Targeted Workload Proof) consensus algorithm, developed independently by the team and using C language, which avoids centralized mine problems to a certain extent; node block generation uses a random extraction mode mining method, and miners confirm the probability of their being picked through gas settings to ensure the randomness of block miners being extracted; · Hybrid network structure: using two types of nodes: public network and internal network to form a network. Theoretically, it supports any CPU for mining to a certain extent, lowering the user participation threshold to a certain extent, and randomly forming with verification nodes The transaction network is fragmented, with partial consensus to complete network-wide consensus; · The storage method has been improved to: cross-parallel storage (CPS) transaction data to form a virtual main chain, combined with distributed hash tables, to solve the high cost problems of traditional data storage methods through serial main chains; · Hierarchical networks cross-chain: network layers, consensus layers, incentive layers, etc. connected to other blockchains (such as the Bitcoin network), which aims to complete the true cross-chain of assets, but this has not yet been achieved; · Using CPU mining, which lowers the mining threshold, each mining machine node needs to pledge 500 pieces Only UENC can start mining, and excessive staking is not possible. It aims to solve three problems: improving on-chain transaction efficiency (expanding the consensus layer main chain through a standard interface); a public bookkeeping chain that is both WASM compatible and can use the UTXO model; and aims to link public chain assets with high-energy consensus algorithms across the chain to the UENC chain to achieve low-cost and fast on-chain token circulation. Construction of the project began in 2018, and a token was issued. Although it is an early project, it has not accumulated sufficient market popularity and participation. According to the project disclosure, there was no financing in the early stages. It was mainly for the team to independently fund research and development. It is expected that capital will be added in the primary market in the future through the mining sector. Ecological construction is still in its infancy. 1.1 Hybrid network structure Due to the restrictions of the three major operators in China, UENC did not use the Kademlia overlay network transmission protocol, but instead adopted a hybrid mesh network structure. Kademlia is a distributed network protocol commonly used in P2P networks. KAD for short, the transmission communication protocol UDP is used between nodes. The main function of UDP is to send IP packets, and the entire node also uses distributed hash tables (DHT). Each client is responsible for a small range of routes, and at the same time stores a small portion of data, which is connected and combined into a complete data network. UENC, on the other hand, divides network nodes into two parts: public network nodes and private network nodes. Public network nodes are a core node group, and the threshold is high: they must meet the requirements of an independent external network IP, and their hardware requirements for the CPU are also relatively high. They must be equipped with at least an 8-core processor and 8 GB of memory. Compared to intranet nodes, the threshold is low, and theoretically any CPU after networking can participate. After an intranet node enters the network, according to the description in its white paper, it must first pass an adaptation period of time (depending on the size of the network). During this period, the intranet node and the public network node request a handshake, and since the public network nodes have clear IP addresses, their respective locations can be clarified. Specific verification node information such as block height, IP address, etc. will be kept in the K bucket (Kad's routing table). Each public network node is linked to some verification nodes (intranet nodes), so only these public network nodes are connected through the network layer and the consensus layer, and each intranet node will randomly perform trusted communication with the public network node and perform communication updates from time to time to ensure the availability of internal and external network communication through a heartbeat monitoring mechanism. This network structure can effectively integrate with the fact that IP addresses are constantly changing, and is also compatible with the different network settings of the three operators, thereby satisfying home users to connect to the UENC blockchain network through their own home network. Since internal network verification nodes randomly make communication requests from public network nodes and implement updates and replacements at irregular times, the arrangement of nodes in the network changes at any time, just like a Rubik's Cube, UENC guarantees its decentralized characteristics. UENC's hybrid network structure, source: TokenInsight uses K-buckets to mark each verification node with a unique ID to ensure the authenticity of the verification node in the network. Through verification of K-bucket data, verification nodes that meet the conditions (such as pledge information, height information, etc.) are concentrated into the verification pool, using discrete random functions...

1900d agoTokenInsight#dPoW #tokenInsight #UENC #Public chain #mining #Rating Report
Who is mining for the DeFi “wave”? Cao Yin and 25 other trendsetters said this

Who is mining for the DeFi “wave”? Cao Yin and 25 other trendsetters said this

The summer of 2020 belongs to DeFi. Compound kicked off this “big drama”, then Uniswap, YFI, YFII, etc. appeared one after another. Both new and old chives were “mining for gold” in this DeFi wave. What did you vote for? What are the investment considerations? Everyone has their own ideas. Bibi News had a great conversation with 25 “trendsetters” in the DeFi sector in the industry. Cao Yin | Managing Director of the Digital Renaissance Foundation, Acala Network Advisor Investment time: around 3 years Investment projects: primary market Acala, Bifrost, Darwinia, Zenlink, Loopring; secondary market: the top 20 have investments. The factors for investing in DeFi are mainly from the perspective of value capture of the underlying protocol. Although many of these mines are very popular now, I'm actually skeptical about whether these mines can actually capture value. Other than Sushiswap, grab the value capture of Uniswap's underlying protocol. Most farmers are difficult to capture value. Of course, apart from those like YFI, they eat the sweetest bite, so this can also capture value, because once we take a bite, we eat it right away. Acala is an underlying stablecoin that can directly capture all the value of future DeFi on Boca. Almost all of Boca's DeFi projects require cooperation with Acala, and they all need to use AUSD to obtain such an asset, just like MakerDAO. DeFi trends: First, look for a new bottom layer, because Ethereum will become increasingly congested. And if you want to find a new bottom layer, Boca is definitely the most suitable bottom layer. In the future, a large number of DeFi will migrate to the new bottom layer, or develop it directly based on the Boca base layer and start development from scratch. Second, the collective rise of Oriental DeFi, like YFiI, has spurred a number of Oriental DeFi. Third, real assets are on-chain DeFi, such as unsecured credit and supply chain finance (gold, US Treasury bonds). These assets can all be used as a basic layer in DeFi in the future. This is something that Aave and Maker must do now. Xu Chaoyi | BKFUND founder Investment time: about 2 years Investment projects: YFI, YFII, Based, YAM, Grap, Curve, Compound, Aave, Sun, etc. There are three main points to consider in investment projects. 1. Does the product itself have an innovative design, because there are actually a bunch of imitations out there, which are basically simple replicas of well-known projects, and some even deliberately add bugs or backdoors to the code in smart contracts. This kind of pure imitation suggests not to play with it; it's very dangerous. However, if it is a reliable community-based team, which is disdainful of simple imitation, it will generally add some of its own innovations and characteristics in terms of products and economic models, and such a team will continue to iterate and improve the product. 2. Follow scientists and KOLs to invest in projects because they are generally careful and serious, and they try to choose reliable projects to invest in when investing in projects; 3. Looking at the ability of the community to operate, the operating ability of the community is strong enough, and the appeal is strong enough. It can stir up huge waves within the community, and it is relatively easy to succeed. DeFi trends: DeFi liquidity mining, which is currently popular, will eventually become a daily decentralized wealth management product that is more popular, has a relatively reasonable yield, but is still higher than financial management in other industries. In addition to liquidity mining, oracles, unsecured loans, and even NFT splitting FTs will spawn some new ways to play. I think there will be plenty of opportunities to make money in the short term. Peng Song | CZZ Technology Community Core Developer Investment time: 2 years Investment projects: YFI, YFII, CZZ, SUSHI, JFI, etc. Investment considerations: Capital safety issues. Nowadays, most of them are doing liquidity mining. Many people rush into the capital without even reviewing the security of the contract. This poses a huge risk to the principal amount. Currently, DeFi is mainly divided into destructive mining and lossless mining. Lossy mainly refers to participating in DEX's capital pool and becoming an LP to pledge mining. Of course, it depends on what basis you are considering this. Lossless mining mainly refers to stablecoin mining. Generally, there is no loss of capital, and it also attracts large amounts of capital to mine. DeFi trends: integration of DeFi underlying assets and construction of cross-chain infrastructure. Nowadays, the entrance to many DeFi projects is very complicated, and there are various currencies to mine...

2173d agody zhang#DeFi #Decentralized finance