Tempo · 165
What happened to Farcaster, which was sold twice in a year and is valued at $1 billion?

What happened to Farcaster, which was sold twice in a year and is valued at $1 billion?

Author: Shenchao TechFlow Original title: Farcaster, which was once valued at 1 billion US dollars, ushered in a project resold for the second time in a year, and was sold twice within a year. What an experience. On August 17, Farcaster operator Neynar's co-creator Rish announced the search for a new team for the Farcaster agreement, official app, and coin platform Clanker. The company returned the remaining funds and the team later disbanded. It's only been 7 months since Neynar took over the project from the founding team. And that handover was Farcaster's first “sold”. This Web3 social star, once invested by Paradigm and a16z and valued at $1 billion, has entered the process of finding a home for the second time in a year. The founding team that left first On January 21 of this year, Farcaster's founding team, Merkle Manufactory, did an uncommon thing: handing over all of the agreements, codebase, official app, and Clanker to Neynar, and then refunded all of the $180 million in financing to investors. The two founders, Dan Romero and Varun Srinivasan, joined the payment chain Tempo (a project incubated by Stripe and Paradigm). The money was refunded, the people left, and the project was left behind. The takeover, Neynar, a middleware company that makes Farcaster development tools, raised $11 million in Series A in 2024. What it saw when it took over was a developer-first social network and a coin machine that was printing money. After 7 months, it also started looking for a new home. Rish wrote in the announcement that the acquisition seemed like a good choice at the beginning of the year, but then it changed so much that Neynar “no longer fits the needs of the next phase.” The announcement was posted on Farcaster in advance, and he said, don't be so sudden this time around. The money printer temporarily shut down. Among the assets Neynar took over, the most valuable was Clanker, an AI one-click coin issuing robot. At the beginning of this year, when the AI coin issuance hype was at its peak, it was Farcaster Ecological's cash cow, which swept away $35 million in on-chain coin service fees in one quarter. According to DeFilLama data, Farcaster Ecosystem's agreement fee: $35.43 million for the first quarter of 2026. In the second quarter, $4.67 million. From July 1 to August 17, $377,000. But for the past 24 hours, the agreement cost was only $4001. From 35.43 million in a single quarter to 4,000 in a single day, the drop was 99%. The cumulative processing fee of 94.1 million US dollars since its launch has become a monument parked at the top of the mountain. Meanwhile, CLANKER token repurchases, which are fed by handling fees, have stopped. The cost side is also an issue. According to Rish, to keep this full-stack social network running, it costs 100,000 dollars a month, and at its peak, 500,000. However, in the last 30 days, the revenue of the entire ecosystem was $120,000, which can only be said to cover the monthly consumption of the project. At the same time, RiSH also wrote on Farcaster: The operating cost is really high, but it really wasn't a factor in our decision. This number is being disclosed because it may influence the next team's decisions. Our balance sheet can absorb current costs indefinitely. The other sentence is more straightforward: “This is not a financial decision. Gathering energy is much harder than raising capital. “(It's much harder to raise energy than capital.) is probably the most accurate microcosm of Farcaster's development over the past seven years. Perhaps the problem with the consumer-grade social illusion Farcaster really isn't the cost. After the market is booming, it is not critical how much money the project burns this month, because the existing capital can still cover this part. But in terms of direction and demand, one question is hard to avoid: Why are users leaving X and coming to you? Alliance Co-Founder Imran's review is straightforward: Farcaster was a useful...

4d ago深潮TechFlow#Farcaster #WEB3

CEO of Etherealize warns of Wall Street Alliance chain revival: fragmenting the ecosystem will reduce blockchain interoperability

Comparing news, Vivek Raman, co-founder and CEO of Etherealize, who is supported by Vitalik Buterin and the Ethereum Foundation, warned that Wall Street's renewed pursuit of private and licensed “alliance chains” is recreating a fragmented system, weakening the interoperability and liquidity that blockchain is supposed to bring, which is equivalent to “bottom to bottom competition.” He pointed out that the rise of gated networks such as Digital Asset's Canton Network, Circle's ARC, and Stripe's Tempo is similar to the reenactment of alliance chains such as R3 and Hyperledger back then, and organizations will eventually fall into a situation where they compete with each other and require permission or membership to participate. Raman emphasized that the Ethereum mainnet should be a globally open, permissionless basic layer similar to HTTP. Institutions can overlay licensing and privacy features at the application layer or L2 to achieve maximum interoperability and liquidity. Etherealize is committed to attracting TradFi to embrace Ethereum, a chain that already hosts billions of dollars in tokenized assets and supports a large number of DeFi settlements. The company received seed funding from Buterin and Foundation in January 2025, and completed Series A financing of 40 million US dollars in the same year. He cites BlackRock's new Ethereum-based fund as an example. After the regulations are clear, institutional funds prefer an open network track owned by no one; if they choose an affiliate chain, they need to pay for the alliance and be bound by its rules, and incentives for non-early members will quickly fade away. Christian Catalini, founder of MIT's Cryptoeconomics Laboratory, also pointed out that if current enterprise sales-oriented licensing networks become mainstream, some of the competitive benefits of blockchain may not be realized. This article is sponsored by GENG, Build Your Fortune on GENG (https://geng.one)

7d agoburnking

BlackRock tokenizes $311 billion European money market fund share

In comparison, BlackRock launched a tokenized share category for European money market funds, involving six funds under the BlackRock Institutional Cash Series, holding a total of US$311 billion in assets. This is BlackRock's first time providing on-chain fund visits in Europe, covering allocative and cumulative shares of the euro, pound, and dollar strategies. Related tokens are minted on Ethereum through Kinexys, the blockchain division of J.P. Morgan Chase. Kinexys is responsible for minting and destroying, and linking on-chain activity to traditional shareholder registration systems. Each token represents a share of the underlying fund, and the official shareholder register is still maintained by the fund transfer agent. Smart contracts can transfer holdings between approved investors' wallets, and the relevant shares are sold to professional and qualified customers, not retail investors. BlackRock also launched a tokenized money market fund for stablecoin reserve management on Solana, Ethereum, and Tempo this Monday. This article is sponsored by GENG, Build Your Fortune on GENG (https://geng.one)

18d agoburnking
Crypto Agent commercialization is accelerating, why are stablecoins the most critical part?

Crypto Agent commercialization is accelerating, why are stablecoins the most critical part?

Core view: For AI agents to become real economic agents, the core obstacle is that traditional payment systems cannot support their autonomous payments. Stablecoins represented by USDC, along with dedicated infrastructure launched by companies such as Coinbase, Circle, and Stripe, are building a native programmable, all-weather, small, high-frequency “currency layer” for AI agents, spawning a program-driven on-chain microeconomy. Key elements: 1. Four major barriers to traditional payments: Agents cannot pass the identity barrier (no ID card), authorization (verification code required), time (not 7 x 24 hours), and cost (high fixed processing fee), and cannot perform small-amount high-frequency transactions. 2. Native advantages of stablecoins: programmable (automatic code execution), no license (self-generated wallet), 7 x 24 hours, transparent accounts and stable value, perfect for agent payment needs. 3. Implementation practices of leading companies: Coinbase launched AgentKit and X402 protocols (more than 50 million transactions have been processed); Circle launched the CCTP cross-chain protocol and AgentStack; Stripe launched a stablecoin API and supported USDC subscription payments. 4. Typical application scenario 1 (ultra-small payment): The x402 protocol and Circle's Gateway Nanopayments achieve $0.000001 micropayments, unlocking the long-term economy of pay-per-use billing for API calls, data access, etc. 5. Typical application scenario 2 (automatic generation): AI agents can achieve “self-hematopoiesis” through yield-bearing stablecoins (such as aUSDC), cover operating costs with interest, and platforms such as Ymax can achieve 8-12% annual stablecoin returns. 6. Large-scale implementation challenges: Private key management is vulnerable to attacks (such as the Owockibot incident), gaps in compliance (agents cannot be identified), and inaccurate AI intentions may lead to irreversible financial losses. Generative AI is changing from a “chatbot” to an AI agent (AI agent) that can do things by itself. A real question then popped up: How do these silicon-based “employees” receive money and how do they pay? Traditional banking stuff — real-name authentication, manual authorization, public accounts — inherently disapproves of AI agents. One answer that is rapidly evolving is to use stablecoins (USDC, USDT, and stablecoins with interest) to create a native “currency layer” for AI. This article will break down the implementation of leading companies such as Coinbase, Circle, and Stripe in this field, while also discussing compliance and security risks. The technical infrastructure is ready, but how to drive it is still a big problem. 1. The “payment breakpoint” encountered in the commercialization of AI agents Today's AI agents are already very capable: book air tickets, write codes, adjust interfaces... but they get stuck as soon as they get to the “payment” step. Traditional payment systems are designed for humans — you have to have an ID card, enter a verification code, operate on weekdays, and have a low processing fee for each transaction. These are all barriers for agents. Specifically, traditional payment systems set up four hurdles for agents: identity barriers: opening a bank account or credit card requires an ID card, face recognition, or even bank transactions, and agents can't even pull it out. Authorization: SMS verification codes, manual confirmation, and 3D security authentication are often required during payment, and agents cannot click buttons even if they cannot receive SMS. Time limit: Banks only process transfers on weekdays and business hours, while agents work 7×24 hours. Cost barrier: Each transaction has a fixed processing fee, such as starting at 30 cents for credit cards, so the pay-per-use model of $0.001 doesn't work at all. However, the financial behavior of agents requires exactly this kind of small, high-frequency charge (such as per number of API calls, per usage). The more fundamental problem is that the entire payment system has never considered direct “program to program” transfers. Even between two technology companies, the process is often: the agent generates an order → sends an email → person approves → person logs in to online banking to transfer money → each other's financial reconciliation. The agent can only do the first two steps and the final record. The most important step, “money from A to B”, must be done by hand. Current experiments: they are all modelling...

18d ago22#AI #stablecoins #wallets

Decentralized AI data network Perceptron Network completes $6.5 million strategic financing, Selini Capital and others participate

Comparing news, the decentralized AI data network Perceptron Network completed $6.5 million in strategic financing, with investors including Sigma Capital, Selini Capital, QCP Capital, P2 Ventures, CoinDCX Ventures, Momentum6, DeFi Capital, Walrus Foundation, Aethir, Colosseum, GuruDev Capital, Tempo Finance, NewTribe Capital, Digital Consensus Fund, and CodeCraft Capital. The funding round will support the launch of Perceptron's data exploration platform, expand its contributor tools and rewards infrastructure, and scale the network to its goal of 5 million nodes. Perceptron aims to consolidate global data collection into a single contributor network, enabling AI companies and ordinary contributors to acquire, validate, and monetize high-quality data sets. Perceptron is currently online and has over 700,000 nodes.

21d ago#financing

Perceptron Raises $6.5 Million to Accelerate Construction of Decentralized AI Data Infrastructure

Comparing news, decentralized AI data network Perceptron announced the completion of a $6.5 million strategic financing. Participants include a number of Web3 investment institutions, trading firms, ecosystem partners and infrastructure companies, including Sigma Capital, Selini Capital, QCP Capital, P2 Ventures, CoinDCX Ventures, Momentum6, DeFi Capital, Walrus Foundation, Aethir, Colosseum, GuruDev Capital, Tempo Finance, NewTribe Capital, Digital Consensus Fund, and CodeCraft Capital. The funding round will be used to launch Perceptron's data task platform, expand contributor tools and reward infrastructure, and drive the network's expansion towards the target of 5 million nodes. Perceptron aims to make real-world data acquisition fast and convenient enough so that AI companies no longer need to rely on centralized data capture infrastructure. The network consolidates global data collection into a unified network of idle bandwidth, unique data sets, and domain expertise. Through this unified form, both individual contributors and AI companies can generate complete and validated data sets, reducing the time from requesting the data to delivering the data set to a few days. Perceptron is in between two models: one end is a centralized data scraping tool with limited capabilities, and the other end is a closed data collaboration that is difficult for most AI startups to qualify for. Perceptron provides data that AI companies and ordinary contributors can directly use. Through Perceptron, contributors own their own data and revenue, which can be monetized or extracted at any time without relying on a third party. Perceptron is geared towards continuous contribution and continuous iteration rather than one-time data capture. Perceptron will focus on launching a data mission platform in the near future, and it is expected that more announcements will be made in the next quarter. Over the long term, Perceptron is moving towards a fully integrated network of 5 million nodes, so that everything AI companies need is centralized on the same platform to achieve a seamless connection between demand and supply.

22d ago

Visa and Artemis jointly released an intelligent payment report: the x402 protocol was launched to process 15 million US dollars of transactions in a year, and the AI micropayment era is rapidly arriving

Comparatively, Visa and the on-chain data analysis platform Artemis previously jointly released the “Agentic Payments from the Ground Up” report, which quantitatively analyzed AI smart payment trends based on real-time on-chain data. According to the report, smart commerce should be divided into macro-transactions (AI agents humans complete reservations, subscriptions, etc., to adapt to existing card systems) and micropayments (high-frequency micropayments between machines, far less than 1 US dollar, making it difficult to support traditional payment structures). The report focuses on analyzing two “machine-native payment” agreements: x402 (developed by Coinbase, Cloudflare, etc., launched in May 2025) as of April 21, 2026, with an adjusted transaction volume of about US$15 million, 109.6 million transactions, 422,000 buyers, and about 5,300 sellers. The activities mainly focused on Base, Solana, and Polygon, settled in USDC; MPP (developed by Stripe and Tempo) (Visa participated, launched in mid-March 2026) The 33-day transaction volume was about 25,000 US dollars, the number of transactions was 115,000, and it also supports on-chain encrypted payments and fiat currency settlements. According to the report, the jump in AI capabilities (after the release of Claude 4.5 and GPT Codex 5.2 in mid-2025) created demand for programmatic payments, compounded by a reduction in blockchain settlement costs, making micropayments in the 1 cent to 1 dollar range economically viable for the first time. Currently, the boundary between cryptographic native agreements and card payment camps is gradually blurring, but smart payments still face trust challenges such as mispurchases, adversarial attacks, and attribution of responsibility.

25d ago

Circle Communications Head Rachel Busch Leaves Job to Join Stablecoin Payment Chain Tempo

Comparing news, Rachel Busch joined the stablecoin payment blockchain Tempo to be responsible for the communications business. Previously, she worked as a senior corporate communications manager at Circle. She said she participated in telling the story of USDC and the Internet financial system during her time at Circle and will continue to participate in the global stablecoin narrative. According to RootData, Tempo is a high-performance Layer 1 blockchain developed by Stripe and Paradigm in collaboration with Paradigm. It targets payment scenarios and supports mainstream stablecoins. It was launched on the main network in March 2026, after completing Series A financing of 500 million US dollars in October 2025, with a valuation of 5 billion US dollars.

25d ago

Bitwise releases 2026 Q3 staking report: activity of major chains has increased but revenue has generally declined, and institutional entry has become the core theme

Comparative news, according to the “2026 Q3 Staking Report” released by Bitwise, the 2026 Q2 showed a differentiated pattern of “increased on-chain activity and reduced fee revenue”. The core driving factor is that various protocols actively reduce block space costs. In terms of core data for each chain, Ethereum's active staking volume reached a record high of 40.2 million ETH (accounting for 33% of total supply), and network revenue fell 51% year over year to $64 million, but rebounded month-on-month in terms of ETH; Solana Q2's real economic value (REV) fell to 51 million US dollars, shrinking sharply from the peak of US$812 million in Q1 in 2025, but the volume of non-voting transactions reached 9.8 billion, and on-chain activity remained resilient; total revenue from the Hyperliquid Q2 protocol At US$174.8 million, perpetual contract transactions reached US$652 billion, and the share of non-cryptographic assets (commodities, stock indices, etc.) rose to 32%; Avalanche's C-chain transaction volume increased by about four times to 236 million transactions, but network revenue was only US$330,000 due to a sharp drop in fees; NEAR's Q2 chain volume plummeted 75% to 77.7 million transactions due to the collapse of Kai-Ching application activity, but the Intents execution layer generated fees about 68 times that of the underlying chain. In terms of institutional adoption, BlackRock launched an Ethereum staked ETF (ETHB), Coinbase and Circle each pledged 500,000 HYPE, and Bitwise, 21Shares, and Grayscale launched HYPE spot ETFs. Additionally, Tempo, a stablecoin payment chain incubated by Stripe and Paradigm, processed $386 million in transfers in the first quarter, and global payroll platform Deel distributed approximately $30 million to 7,200 contractors through the chain.

29d ago
Stripe is struggling to change, and the time for agents in the payment industry is yet to arrive

Stripe is struggling to change, and the time for agents in the payment industry is yet to arrive

Author: Grandpa Zao's Crooked Mountain Original title: Eternal Fragments of Money: Three Party Payments, four generations without a primary payment business, want the rain to fill the air. Stripe is also trying to buy PayPal, and Feng Shui is taking turns. The last time was 30 years ago, Peter Thiel's PayPal merged with Musk's original X.com. I don't understand why everyone is talking about PayPal's sluggish growth, as if this FinTech circuit is full of trouble and bad for us. Twenty years ago, Peter Thiel embarked on a payment journey and started his first business, and the PayPal gang came all together. Wherever Musk went, the public welcomed him wholeheartedly. It really can be described as when the sky was full of life, the state where everything flourished was still right in front of us. After just 20 years, did Payment change and become our burial place? The growth is a miracle. Stablecoins aren't listed due to the Stripe pandemic; now it's a failure. Stripe's various efforts are aimed at an unattainable dream of going public. In the context of the pandemic, Stripe touched a $100B valuation for the first time. However, it did not follow the listing of Coinbase and the like, causing its valuation to fall over and over again, mistakenly treating the opportunities of the times as a personal effort, so in the midst of pain, Stripe embarked on the path of mergers and acquisitions. Stripe started with a Dev-friendly model, with one-click API access, which is very tempting for developers. It's also the most unique way to play in the payment industry. It doesn't worry about rates and scenarios, but rather reaches out to the people actually working behind them. Stripe hopes to reinvent the entire payment industry by reusing its experience, moving from the B-side to the billing system, from the C-side to stablecoins, and even laying out ACP/MPP agreements on the Agent side. Photo Caption: Stripe's bumpy path to listing Image source: @zuoyeweb3支付行业始终存在两个特点 also hampers Stripe's continued progress: the highly fragmented pattern of the payments industry has not changed. If one country, one industry, or even a few companies are defined, they can continue to survive and cannot be directly eradicated by external forces; payments are an accessory to the banking industry. Developers and B/C-side companies are ultimately externalized banking processes, and stablecoins are eventually included in the bank's trajectory. In particular, the series of stablecoin acquisitions, from the issuance of Bridge, to Privy's wallet portal, and even Tempo and OpenUSD, can hardly repeat Stripe's past glory. The proposed takeover of PayPal is actually a phased result of Stripe's attempt to open up the C-side failure with stablecoins, trying to make up for itself with PayPal's C-side business. PayPal's problem isn't that it can't keep up with the times; nothing from Venmo to PYUSD has saved PayPal's downtrend. In other words, PayPal is really old. The entire enterprise is structurally disabled, and it's no longer possible to start a new business to recover. Stripe, which launched a little later, also wanted to add more narrative possibilities to itself before its IPO. If the Stripe package backend dominates the developer market, then the stablecoin market package front-end - distribution network story is probably over. Tempo and OpenUSD will impact Circle's stock price, but they won't be able to touch Tether in the slightest. If Stripe's upper limit is Coinbase or Circle, then the listing is bound to break the fate. Compared with Adyen's market capitalization and the valuation of Sky Cloud Exchange, Stripe's stablecoin narrative X Agent's narrative is useful. Stablecoins are not a part of the current payment system; they are a visible trend; agents still need to find an entry point for themselves to enter the current system. On the front side of the news, Agent is already buying computing power and tokens with stablecoins, but apart from removing quantitative suspicions, Agent still hasn't entered the Web3 business, let alone more conservative companies or banking systems. Photo Caption: Currently, Agent is mainly used to scan volume Image source: @BarkerMoneyXA side (future), B-side, C-side, and D-side (startup), but Stripe's valuation can hardly escape the reasonable value of the FinTech limit of 50 billion dollars. 100 billion contains too much active imagination. If it's not possible to reach the future for a short time, then scale up and...

32d agoburnking#agent #Agentic #CoinW